--- description: Learn more about CredentialStream price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Ireland. Read verified software reviews and discover tools that fit your business needs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CredentialStream Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Ireland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Workflow Management Software](/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) > [CredentialStream](/software/172448/verity) # CredentialStream Canonical: https://www.capterra.ie/software/172448/verity Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ie/software/172448/verity?page=2) > HealthStream's SaaS-based software platform is designed to automate \& streamline credentialing, privileging, \& enrollment processes. > > Verdict: Rated **3.9/5** by 120 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses CredentialStream? Health systems, health plans, outpatient facilities, and medical groups with credentialing, privileging, enrollment, and evaluation solution needs. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **3.9/5** | 120 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HealthStream - **Founded**: 1999 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Per User - **Pricing Details**: Please contact VerityStream directly for pricing information. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Ad hoc Reporting - Alerts/Notifications - Application Management - Appointment Management - Business Process Automation - Committee Management - Credential Management - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Enrollments/Onboarding - Expiration Management - Forms Management - License Verification - Online Applications - Privileging - Reminders - Reporting/Analytics - Secure Data Storage - Task Management - Third-Party Integrations - Web Forms - Workflow Configuration ## Integrations (1 total) - Docusign ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Workflow Management Software](https://www.capterra.ie/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Workflow Management Software](https://www.capterra.ie/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) - [Credentialing Software](https://www.capterra.ie/directory/30905/credentialing/software) - [Data Collection Software](https://www.capterra.ie/directory/32475/data-collection/software) ## Alternatives 1. [CredentialMyDoc](https://www.capterra.ie/software/151925/credentialmydoc) — 4.3/5 (71 reviews) 2. [QGenda](https://www.capterra.ie/software/90628/qgenda) — 4.2/5 (68 reviews) 3. [Xvoucher](https://www.capterra.ie/software/1048599/xvoucher) — 4.8/5 (46 reviews) 4. [Incredable](https://www.capterra.ie/software/182856/ready-doc) — 4.9/5 (9 reviews) 5. [MedTrainer](https://www.capterra.ie/software/176583/medtrainer) — 4.3/5 (147 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Senior Credentialing Coordinator" — 4.0/5 > **Misty** | *18 March 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love the widgets and the overall visual experience of the platform. > > **Cons**: The variables are not easy to choose when building reports and a lot of the time it's a trial-and-error process when building new reports. > > Overall, my experience has been wonderful with Credential Stream. It has made the credentialing process much easier even though its more tailored to a Hospital Based organization rather than a primary care/multi-specialty group like our organization. ----- ### "Honest Review" — 2.0/5 > **Cynthia** | *18 March 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 1.0/10 > > **Pros**: Some of the Bolt reporting capabilities are helpful, but there are many variables left to be desired, and creating a Bolt report is not very easy for beginners. > > **Cons**: Automation failing without explanation (and without us finding out until after the fact), delays, outages, slowness, visual presentation (white background is detrimental to ocular health), inflexibility in many areas. > > after 15 months "live" in the system, we still struggle daily with issues/failures/delays in the system. At any given time we have a multitude of tickets open with support. We have lost significant efficiency since go-live, due to extra clicks, extra navigation, slowness, outages, etc. ----- ### "Director of RCM" — 4.0/5 > **Angelia** | *9 January 2025* | Health, Wellness & Fitness | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: I was excited about the automations and of how many enrollment applications were available in the system. > > **Cons**: It's not user friendly and I worry we don't have it set up to best optimization. > > Too often it has a lag and finding the enrollment applications should be easier than it is. ----- ### "CredentialStream Pros" — 5.0/5 > **Stephanie** | *18 March 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The organization and detailed system which helps make my job more efficient. > > **Cons**: I am not a fan of not being able to manually add requested privileges, if the privileges did not come through their reappointment application, due to their current privileges already listed; it won't let me add the same DOP twice even though it's will be categorized at requested privileges not current. > > CredentialStream has made my job easier and more efficient. Even though I have just started using this about 5 months ago, I have been able to close out intial and reappointment files faster than ever, and everything is more organized to be able to work more efficiently. ----- ### "Implementation Opportunities" — 3.0/5 > **Tara** | *9 January 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **Pros**: The pros would mostly include the idea of certain things working properly. It is difficult to find the many pros because the implementation has been extremely challenging. The items that can be automated are the pros and reports (although it takes hours to create some new ones and is very tricky). The biggest barriers have been how the structure and set up of support/client services as well as the implementation plan. On a positive note - our privileging consultant is absolutely the best thing and most helpful contact at healthstream. \[sensitive content hidden\] places customer service at the very very top. She is brilliant, knows how to educate her clients but also knows when to step back and let them do things on their own. She is a best practice in your company on client service and expertise. I could not have done it without her. \[sensitive content hidden\] has also been phenomenal. They are very quick to respond. You feel like a priority and they 100% understand their system but also our side of privileging. This is key. > > **Cons**: The implementation planning. It felt like boxes to check off and not actually someone (or a team) sitting down with us to figure out what we need as an organization and team. Looking back, I would completely revamp the implementation program. This is not a critique on people as much as it is process and CredentialStream's strategy. I completely understand the logic of having clients troubleshoot on their own, when appropriate. However, when you are initially learning an entire new system, there should be a high level of physical support for your clients. > > I keep saying it will get better. However, our volume is always extremely high and we are expected to troubleshoot all on our own or enter support tickets and wait for replies. By the time we get help, we have already moved on to another priority and have to find time to go back. There really needs to be a single source (several) expert for this system so organizations can have one person from the very beginning that can sit with them to train and go through any questions they have but assess their current workflows and help them adjust for the new system. Even before implementation, it is important to be able to show why we need this information (when it comes to data mapping), and show what happens if you do not have it entered perfectly. It would have been very helpful to state which companies (you use for verifications now) will require a brand new, different agreement than you have now. I have had to learn this as I go and work new contacts as we find time. Our contract review process is somewhat laborious and can take time. It has been frustrating and caused financial loss in some cases when we had a subcription that is paid for but needed a completely new one that doesn't credit any of that payment with the other contract (example: Certifacts) I generally am a positive person and learn things easily. I keep saying to myself and my team that it will get better. It has improved but there are still so many things that could be improved so clients feel more supported throughout the implementation. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ie/software/172448/verity?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ie/software/172448/verity) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Structured Data